Poetry versus Prose (ZT)

Source: The Fact Checker (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/)

"You campaign in poetry, but you govern in prose."
–Hillary Clinton, Nashua, N.H., January 6, 2008.

I will get back to fact checking tomorrow, but first let me share my
impressions from four exciting days in New Hampshire. When I heard
Hillary Clinton quote Mario Cuomo in a packed sports hall in Nashua on
Sunday, I knew instantly that she had captured the essence of the 2008
presidential campaign. The most important distinction in this race, at
least at this stage, is not between the Democratic party and the
Republican party. It is between the Poetry party and the Prose party.

Barack Obama is the epitome of the poetry candidate. His speeches
are short on details and specific policy proposals. But with his
rhetoric about "hope" and "change," he soars effortlessly above his
plodding, earth-bound rivals. Hillary Clinton is the prose candidate,
par excellence. She arrives at meetings armed with long lists of
carefully thought-out policies, from improving the Pell grant program
to combating autism. While she can hit the high notes on occasion, she
fails to stir as much passion as her rival.

It is a similar story on the Republican side. John McCain has honed
his stump speech down to two essentials. As president, he will go to
war against pork in Washington and will protect America from its
foreign enemies. Mitt Romney addresses audiences in front of a
billboard listing 13 separate campaign promises, from universal health
care to strengthening families. He is not so much a prose candidate as
a data candidate.

Poetry candidates talk about hope; prose candidates emphasize
experience. Poetry candidates synthesize their message; prose
candidates draw up laundry lists. Poetry candidates campaign on a story
and a personal narrative; prose candidates campaign on their records.
Poetry candidates focus on "tomorrow" rather than "yesterday." With
prose candidates, the emphasis is usually the other way around.

Poetry candidates run on charisma. Prose candidates run on
competence. Poetry candidates tend to be outsiders, prose candidates
insiders. Poetry candidates appeal to the heart, prose candidates to
the head.

As I followed the candidates around New Hampshire, I began thinking
of them not as Democrats and Republicans, but as representatives of the
Poetry party and the Prose party. Here is my list:

Poetry candidates Prose candidates
Barack Obama Hillary Clinton
John McCain Mitt Romney
Mike Huckabee Rudy Giuliani
John Edwards Bill Richardson

As you can see from that list, the Poetry candidates come in a
variety of flavors. A Huckabee speech is very different from an Obama
speech. Like Obama and McCain, however, Huckabee is a synthesizer. His
message consists of two essentials: (1) I am a regular guy, just like
you, the voter. (2) I represent Christian values.

To adapt a distinction coined by the English philosopher Isaiah Berlin in his essay "The Hedgehog and the Fox,"
prose candidates (foxes) know many different things, but they are
little things. Poetry candidates (hedgehogs) know one big thing.

This
is a particularly interesting election because there are poetry
candidates in both parties. In the Democratic party, Obama has the
lion’s share of the poetry vote, but Edwards (anti-special interests,
fighting to save the middle class) is positioning himself to pick up
the change mantle should the front runner falter. In the Republican
party, the poetry vote is divided between Huckabee and McCain, so
anything is possible.

In many American elections, there has not been a top-notch poetry
candidate and a top-notch prose candidate. Prose candidates dominated
the last two elections, Bush vs. Kerry and Bush vs. Gore. When there is
a choice, the poetry candidates tend to do better, particularly at
turning points in American history.

Poetry party Prose party
Bill Clinton George H.W. Bush
Ronald Reagan Carter/Mondale
John F. Kennedy Richard Nixon

You could detect the frustration in Hillary Clinton’s voice when she
made the poetry/prose distinction in the sports hall in Nashua. She did
not mention Obama, but everybody knew whom she was talking about. It is
not easy being a prose candidate and see a much less accomplished (in
your mind) rival catch fire with the voters. You work so hard, and you
are so diligent, but your efforts go unrewarded. This explains that very emotional moment on the campaign trail yesterday in New Hampshire.

"Some of us are ready, and some of us are not. Some of us know what
we will do on Day One, and some of us have not really thought that
through."

She is right. Life–and elections–are so unfair.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: